Editorial standards
Brain Rush Games publishes editorial coverage of the software people use to run games: classroom review games, Jeopardy-style boards, trivia nights, workplace team-building and AI quiz generators.
Affiliated products
Brain Rush Games and Kleveroo are operated by the same owner. Kleveroo is marked as an affiliated product in our product database, which automatically triggers a disclosure on every page where it is reviewed, ranked, compared or recommended.
- Affiliated products are evaluated against the same stated criteria as every other product.
- Affiliation gives no automatic ranking advantage, and never a guaranteed top position.
- Competing products rank above affiliated products whenever the criteria support it.
- Limitations for affiliated products are stated as plainly as for anyone else.
- We name the situations where a competitor is the better choice.
How we evaluate products
- Every ranked article states the criteria used to decide its order.
- Product facts come from official vendor pages wherever possible.
- Pricing and feature claims carry the date an editor last verified them.
- First-hand testing is only claimed when an actual testing record exists; otherwise no “we tested” language appears.
- Anything we have not confirmed is labelled unverified rather than guessed.
- Corrections are made when information becomes outdated or inaccurate, and the article's modified date reflects the change.
What we verify
Every platform in our directory has an editorial description written by our team, a pricing model recorded from the vendor's own pricing page, and a timestamp for when an editor last checked it. Capability flags — free plan, AI generation, live multiplayer, custom boards, whether students need their own device — are only set when we have confirmed them. Anything unconfirmed displays as “not verified” rather than a guess.
What we refuse to publish
- Star ratings or scores we cannot justify from stated criteria.
- Aggregate review counts we have not sourced.
- Testimonials or quotes that are not real and attributable.
- Population statistics (“84% of teachers…”) without a citation.
- Vendor marketing copy reproduced as if it were our assessment.
Our publishing tools actively block drafts containing these patterns, along with placeholder text, so they cannot reach the site by accident.
How rankings are decided
Rankings are set manually by editors. Each ranked position carries a written reason, a statement of what the platform is best for, and its limitations. Position is never sold, and no platform can pay for inclusion or placement.
How we handle links
We link to official product pages so you can verify claims yourself. Outbound links to vendors carry nofollow. Where we may earn a commission, that is disclosed on the page in question. Commission never affects ranking, inclusion or the wording of a limitation.
Corrections
Platforms change constantly. Articles record both their original publication date and the date of the most recent editorial update, and we re-verify platform details on a rolling schedule. If you find something out of date or wrong, we want to fix it — accuracy is the entire point of this site.
Machine-readable summaries
We publish an llms.txt summary, an RSS feed and a sitemap so both search engines and AI systems can read our coverage accurately, with attribution, rather than inferring it.
Browse our sections

